After a less rainy spring, the Chesapeake Bay may see smaller dead zone than normal

By: - June 18, 2020 12:01 am

Snowy egrets and mallard on eroding marsh near Poplar Island in Talbot County, Md., on May 20, 2010. (Photo by Alicia Pimental/Chesapeake Bay Program)

Thanks to a less rainy spring, the Chesapeake Bay’s “dead zone” is likely to be slightly smaller this summer than normal, though it will still be bigger than long-term targets for the nation’s largest estuary, scientists announced Wednesday. 

Ecologically, a dead zone is part of a body of water that is unable to sustain plant or animal life due to a lack of oxygen, a condition known as hypoxia. 

The phenomenon is the result of years of excess nutrients, particularly nitrogen, flowing into waters from agricultural fields, wastewater sites and urban and suburban areas. These nutrients fuel enormous growths of algae that eventually die and decompose, depleting the waters of oxygen.

While the biggest dead zone in the U.S. is found in the Gulf of Mexico, the Chesapeake Bay has also long suffered from hypoxia, giving rise to the emergence of a dead zone. 

Researchers at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science have found that the Chesapeake’s dead zone, which appears along its main-stem in the summer, covers about 40 percent of the bay’s area and as much as 5 percent of its volume.

A Virginia Marine Institute of Science “nowcast” of dissolved oxygen in the Chesapeake Bay on June 17. (Virginia Institute of Marine Science)

This year, scientists anticipate the dead zone will be 9 percent smaller than normal.

That decline is due to not only less rainfall this spring but also less runoff carrying nutrients within the watershed as a result of long-term reduction plans colloquially called “pollution diets” enacted by bay states such as Virginia. 

Nitrogen pollution this spring, as measured at nine river monitoring stations, was 17 percent below the long-term average.

While Lisa Feldt, vice president for environmental protection and restoration with the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said in a statement that “the good news is that dead zones are shrinking over time,” she cautioned that “a prediction for a dead zone that is ‘slightly smaller than average’ is nothing to cheer.”

“If accurate, we will continue to see harmful algal blooms and underwater dead zones where crabs, fish, oysters, and other marine life can’t survive,” she said.

Many Virginia watermen are already struggling this year as a result of market disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

The forecasts come amid pending litigation by Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency over what the states say is that agency’s failure to enforce pollution reduction targets for New York and Pennsylvania.

The latter state, which disproportionately affects the Chesapeake’s water quality because of its upstream position, has long lagged behind the other bay states in its cleanup efforts.

Measuring dead zones

One key measurement used by scientists to assess the extent of the problem is hypoxic volume, or the amount of water affected by hypoxia at a given time.

In the bay, the average total annual hypoxic volume — the sum of the hypoxic volumes that have occurred each day in a year — is 809 km3 days, said Chesapeake Bay Program Communications Director Rachel Felver. 

For scale, the Virginia Institute for Marine Science estimates that 1 cubic kilometer holds roughly the same amount of water as 400,000 Olympic-size swimming pools.

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Sarah Vogelsong
Sarah Vogelsong

Sarah is the Mercury's environment and energy reporter, covering everything from utility regulation to sea level rise. Originally from McLean, she has spent over a decade in journalism and academic publishing and previously worked as a staff reporter for Chesapeake Bay Journal, the Progress-Index and the Caroline Progress. She is the recipient of a first place award for explanatory reporting from the Society of Environmental Journalists and has twice been honored by the Virginia Press Association as "Best in Show" for online writing. She was chosen for the 2020 cohort of the Columbia Energy Journalism Initiative and is a graduate of the College of William and Mary. Contact her at [email protected]